swiss propaganda research bias
", "Desinformation in der Schweiz: Propaganda statt seriöser Forschung", "Swiss Propaganda Research: Anonyme Warner mit scharfem S", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Swiss_Policy_Research&oldid=985738301, Articles with minor POV problems from October 2020, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License, This page was last edited on 27 October 2020, at 17:38. In this article, , there is the use of several poor sources to support their claims such as the, . Fair Use Policy Finally, ownership is not disclosed. [5], In 2017 a University of Zurich report on media in Switzerland analyzed "six of the most-discussed 'alternative media'", including SPR. [6], Andrea Haefely wrote a critique of the website in the magazine Beobachter in May 2020, noting: "The website Swiss Propaganda Research assumes that the Swiss media does what SPR itself does: feed the readers with questionable information." Swiss Policy Research is also providing information regarding the Coronavirus with mixed facts and misinformation. SPR articles have been published or shared by numerous (independent) media outlets and journalists, among them Julian Assange and Daniele Ganser, and have been translated into more than a dozen languages. [1], In one of its latest published works, SPR warns that Wikipedia is anything but an open, transparent and reliable source of information. The website also promotes other unproven conspiracy theories such as the majority of the USA media being controlled by The Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderbergs, and the Trilateral Commission. Post was not sent - check your email addresses! They report on their about page that “Our articles have been published or shared by numerous independent media outlets and journalists, among them Julian Assange, and have been translated into more than two dozen languages.”. He has noted that the anonymity of the website creates doubts over the reliability and authenticity of its research, particularly in a country such as Switzerland, which has full freedom of its press. Further, this list of so-called facts also contains unproven conspiracy theories such as this: “NSA wholesaler Edward Snowden warns that the “coronavirus crisis” will be used for the, massive and continuous expansion of global surveillance, . Funding. SPR is composed of independent academics and receives no external funding.” There is no other information available regarding ownership. For example, when reporting on the Israel Lobby they provide a link to a video from the Questionable Unz Review, which is classified as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center and antisemitic by the Anti-Defamation League. Other sources used include RT and Sputnik, which they openly criticize as Russian Propaganda in other articles. Although, SPR thoroughly sources information they often use very poor sources that lack credibility. In some countries, such “contact tracking” is already carried out directly, . * What methods do they use? For example, an editor is not named and articles do not name an author. This page was last edited on 16 August 2020, at 18:24. For example, when reporting on the, they provide a link to a video from the Questionable. LET US KNOW HERE. [2], In another March 2020 article "On Corona, the Media, and Propaganda", SPR reminds us in the context of COVID-19 that "the old and proven propaganda rule applies again: the less is known, the more is speculated. * Who are the authors of articles? This is a quick and rough evaluation of a English version of the site. In several parts of the world, the population is already. His boss just sent a work wide email with a link to Swiss propaganda research’s information on Covid 19 which seems to really minimize its severity. In review, Swiss Policy Research is a website that purports to investigate geopolitical propaganda in Swiss and international media. Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email. Daniel Vogler concluded that SPR "resorts to conspiracy theories", and its contents are mostly "pseudo-scientific". Articles and headlines use minimally loaded wording such as this: Geopolitical propaganda on public radio: An analysis using the example of Swiss radio and television, . They report on their about page that “Our articles have been published or shared by numerous independent media outlets and journalists, among them, , and have been translated into more than two dozen languages.”, Swiss Policy Research completely lacks transparency as there is not a single name affiliated with the website. Has this Media Source failed a fact check? These sources may be untrustworthy for credible/verifiable information, therefore fact checking and further investigation is recommended on a per article basis when obtaining information from these sources. In general, this is a conspiracy website that is not credible due to poor sourcing and lack of transparency. Although, SPR thoroughly sources information they often use very poor sources that lack credibility. SPR is composed of independent academics and receives no external funding. Sources in the Conspiracy-Pseudoscience category may publish unverifiable information that is not always supported by evidence. According to Christoph Neuberger, a professor at the Free University of Berlin, SPR is a source of pseudoscientific misinformation.

.

2017 Honda Civic Maintenance Light Reset, Nissan Rogue 2012 Reviews Consumer Reports, Lincoln Continental For Sale In Houston, Balanced Xlr Wiring, Law And Morality Articles,